Antes de 26 Dezembro 2012.
Sou contra a proposta INTERVENÇÕES
PARA MELHORIA DAS CONDIÇÕES
BALNEARES submetido pelo Melia
Llana Beach, pelas seguintes razões:
1. Eu não quero ver o mar (praia)
de Algodoeiro torna-se um Gueto turistico, com praias privadas.
2. Estou preocupada com o impacto
ambiental, em particular com as tartarugas marinhas.
3. Estou preocupada com a formação
das ondas da mundialmente famosa praia de Ponta Pret.
I object to the proposal INTERVENÇÕES
PARA MELHORIA DAS CONDIÇÕES BALNEARES submitted by Melia Llana Beach for the
following reasons:
1. I do not wish to see Algodoeiro become a
tourist ghetto, with 'private' beaches.
2. I am concerned about the impact to the
environment, particularly to marine turtles.
3. I am concerned about the disruption of the
world famous break at Ponta Preta.
Download the full
proposal here.
Breakwater on Algodoeiro may benefit tourists
but could have a big impact on the environment.
The Resort Group plans to build a breakwater on Algodoeiro (the west coast
of Sal), the purpose of which is to improve swimming for tourists at their
three hotels. Algodoeiro has a
layer of rocks that are uncovered at low tide meaning that once or twice a day,
to be able to swim there tourists must walk across the rocks.
The project involves the construction of two breakwaters perpendicular to
the coastline, creating a beach in the middle. It has been rumoured that the cost of such a plan is
€3,000,000 plus ongoing maintenance costs). The initial plan that was considered enclosed a much larger
area and and included dredging a 3000m2 area of the seafloor.
The final plan that has been submitted for assesment by the General
Directorate of the Environment and other authorities, is shown below.
As part of the plan, the rocks under the sea will be removed (possibly by using
explosives). The breakwaters will
then be built as shown Since the
sand will accumulate on either side of the breakwater and not inside, the beach
must be replenished by artificial means - either by importing it or by finding
a source from another part of the island.
The study was completed by WW-Hydraulic Consultants and Construction Maritime SA
on behalf of The Resort Group between July and September 2012
and looked at the various negative and positive impacts of such a project.
The positive impacts include more comfortable swimming
conditions for visitors to Sal, some extra, temporary jobs and the creation of
an artificial reef (replacing the existing natural reef). However, other aspects could be quite
negative and concerns about this project include:
1. The exact
position & size of the proposed breakwater has not been defined.
2. The disruption
to the beach during the construction phase. The proposal includes closing a section of the beach and
heavy machinery will create noise and dust.
3. The length or
timing of the proposed works have not been included in the document.
4. The impact on
the movement of sand (building up
on the north side of the breakwater and not replenishing on the south).
5. The need to
replenish the sand inside the breakwater with sand from another area thereby
changing the ecology of the coast.
6. The destruction
of the marine life that currently inhabit the rocky areas.
7. An impact on the
wave action that may disrupt surfing, windsurfing & kitesurfing in the
world famous beach of Ponta Preta.
8. The consultant's
limited study time (3 months) may not be sufficient to understand the long term
impact.
9.
The impact on endangered and protected loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta
including disruption of the beach during the nesting season (noise, lights
& obstructions) and the walls preventing them exiting the sea to lay their
nests.
10. This zone is part of
Cape Verde's network of Protected Areas (PCSAPCV) and this kind of project is
not permitted under the management plan.
Naturally, for SOS Tartarugas, the biggest concern is about the impact to
the turtles. For some reason, no data or reports from this
organisation, which has six years experience of monitoring the ecology of
Algodoeiro, has been used in the preparation of the breakwater proposal.
The proposal states that the area is not important for turtles as "the location is outside the
preferred areas for nesting turtles since it is rocky. The species only nests in sandy places
and without obstructions to facilitate the exit of adults and the entry of
juveniles. " A map of
Sal has been included in the proposal.
This map is nota a map of nesting areas but is a map which is used by
the City Hall of Sal and SOS Tartarugas to define the main monitoring
points (soldier's stations, camps etc) that are important for the prevention of
hunting of turtles.
Unfortunately the authors of the proposal have misinterpreted this map and
believe it to mean that the turtles ONLY nest exactly at the yellow numbered
dots.
"As can be seen in
the figure below, which shows the areas of the island of Sal where there is
prevalence of turtle nesting, the zone under study is not included in the areas used by this species for the
purpose of nesting.
In this sense, it is safe to assume that the project area is an area of little or no influence of sea turtles, it is not used for nesting by the same fact that a zone with enough rocks on the shore and therefore in the project will have negative impact on this species. By observing the figure below it can be seen that the project area is located between the points 4 & 5, these points identified as spawning areas. "
In this sense, it is safe to assume that the project area is an area of little or no influence of sea turtles, it is not used for nesting by the same fact that a zone with enough rocks on the shore and therefore in the project will have negative impact on this species. By observing the figure below it can be seen that the project area is located between the points 4 & 5, these points identified as spawning areas. "
It is of great concern that the consultants spent the
summer in Sal and did not contact SOS Tartarugas or make use of the reports
& scientific papers which have been submitted to The Resort Group about the
nesting zone and the impact of development. This has resulted in the significance of this area to
nesting turtles not being taken into consideration.
The real picture can be seen below (the proposed
construction is in front of the red box)
The
coloured dots represent areas of turtle activity over the last five years. It can be seen that directly in front
of Melia Llana Beach where the proposed breakwater will go has a significant
number of nests.
The
lack of understanding of the behaviour and biology of loggerhead turtles is
obvious in this report and the assumptions made are incorrect for two reasons:
1.
if rocks are exposed are at low tide it does not matter because turtles will exit
the beach on high tide.
2.
turtles do not come out of the sea and nest directly in front of the place that
they exited. They may walk
diagonally or in a random way and often choose to nest in a place far away from
the original exit point.
Algodoeiro is a unique place for turtles on Sal, with a different ecology
to other beaches. In addition, a
genetic study has stated that the turtles that nest on this coastline have
differences in make up than those that nest on other beaches. Therefore it is not enough to state
that turtles will find other areas as the issues are more complicated than
that.
The proposal itself states that the project should not "Cause the
destruction or damage of sensitive environmental areas" or "involve any extinction
of or affect any species with special
status of protection". However it does seem that the project would create some serious negative
impacts in both of these case should it go ahead.
Given that the main purpose is to allow tourists to enter the sea at low tide, this project does not seem out of balance when the massive cost, both in terms of money and environmental impact is taken into consideration.
The public consultation period ends on December 27th,
2012. To voice your support or
concerns please email Maria.R.Soares@mahot.gov.cv or Moises.Borges@mahot.gov.cv
or leave your comments at the Library in Espargos.
Well done Jacquie. Amazing that they're even considering it! I hope to god it doesn't get passed!
ReplyDeleteBibi